<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pentaho, Breach Security make open source acquisitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/09/25/pentaho-breach-security-make-open-source-acquisitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/09/25/pentaho-breach-security-make-open-source-acquisitions/</link>
	<description>A blog for the enterprise open source community</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raven Zachary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/09/25/pentaho-breach-security-make-open-source-acquisitions/#comment-11334</link>
		<dc:creator>Raven Zachary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/09/25/pentaho-breach-security-make-open-source-acquisitions/#comment-11334</guid>
		<description>This is a debatable point, but I know where you're coming from. I am reusing the wording from Pentaho's own press release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a debatable point, but I know where you&#8217;re coming from. I am reusing the wording from Pentaho&#8217;s own press release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swashbuckler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/09/25/pentaho-breach-security-make-open-source-acquisitions/#comment-5587</link>
		<dc:creator>Swashbuckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/09/25/pentaho-breach-security-make-open-source-acquisitions/#comment-5587</guid>
		<description>A comment on verbiage: an open source project cannot be acquired.  The developers of the project can be, but not the project itself.  If the project could be acquired it would not be open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A comment on verbiage: an open source project cannot be acquired.  The developers of the project can be, but not the project itself.  If the project could be acquired it would not be open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
