<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snort creator Sourcefire addresses lawsuit from rival NetClarity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/12/19/snort-creator-sourcefire-addresses-lawsuit-from-rival-netclarity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/12/19/snort-creator-sourcefire-addresses-lawsuit-from-rival-netclarity/</link>
	<description>A blog for the enterprise open source community</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: StillSecure, After All These Years</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/12/19/snort-creator-sourcefire-addresses-lawsuit-from-rival-netclarity/#comment-12381</link>
		<dc:creator>StillSecure, After All These Years</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/12/19/snort-creator-sourcefire-addresses-lawsuit-from-rival-netclarity/#comment-12381</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The pot calling the kettle black and not all open is open source...&lt;/strong&gt;

I have been following the Sourefire IPO saga for some time now, literally since the Checkpoint deal was quashed and Team Marty announced they were going to IPO. Like others here and here, I never thought that the IPO would...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The pot calling the kettle black and not all open is open source&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I have been following the Sourefire IPO saga for some time now, literally since the Checkpoint deal was quashed and Team Marty announced they were going to IPO. Like others here and here, I never thought that the IPO would&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Sources</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/12/19/snort-creator-sourcefire-addresses-lawsuit-from-rival-netclarity/#comment-12273</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Sources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2006/12/19/snort-creator-sourcefire-addresses-lawsuit-from-rival-netclarity/#comment-12273</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sourcefire IPO complete with IP hassle...&lt;/strong&gt;

Via 451 CAOS: Snort creator Sourcefire addresses lawsuit from rival NetClarity In court filings, among other things, it seems that PredatorWatch is asking this question: Did Check Point discover anything in its due diligence  the process investigatin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sourcefire IPO complete with IP hassle&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Via 451 CAOS: Snort creator Sourcefire addresses lawsuit from rival NetClarity In court filings, among other things, it seems that PredatorWatch is asking this question: Did Check Point discover anything in its due diligence  the process investigatin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
