451 CAOS Theory 
A blog for the enterprise open source community
Microsoft open source may be good for open source
Jay Lyman, October 26, 2007 @ 1:32 pm ETIt seems we’ve arrived upon Microsoft open source. In the last couple of years, whenever there was discussion of Microsoft’s open source projects and efforts such as CodePlex or Port25, there was typically the standard open source response: it’s not OSI-approved; it’s not real open source. Now, with OSI approval of two Microsoft licenses, the proprietary software giant can legitimately say these projects and programs are open source.
It will be interesting to see whether Microsoft blurs the distinction of its now OSI-approved licenses, the Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) and Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL), and other licenses used in CodePlex, SourceForge or other projects. There will certainly be the usual Redmond-level scrutiny from developers and open source proponents. One of the underlying benefits of open source software, which is developed, maintained and improved in the open, is that there is far less room to pull any kind of shenanigans. Microsoft and its open source strategists are smart and are surely aware of the magnifying glass hovering around them and use of the term open source. This may also help to further legitimize open source. It’s hard to call it a cancer, communism, intellectual property threat or hobbyist when you’re sinking real dollars into it and most likely, expecting real dollars out. While it seems the scrutiny and bar on what constitutes open source is appropriate, we must remember that Microsoft is not the only potential poser or abuser of open source.
It’s unavoidable that Microsoft will be treated differently, and perhaps that is the price for past offenses and present conflicts. It is most likely, however, that Microsoft will mind its ps and qs, meaning it won’t be calling anything open source unless it truly is. Now the company can legitimately label something ‘Microsoft open source.’ We’ll be watching to see how liberally Redmond and others do or do not make the claim.
Comments (7) Categories: Software
Microsoft open source may be good for open source…
Interesting point at feeds.the451group.com…
Is a new dawn for the open source brand approaching?…
In his post about Microsoft open source, Jay Lyman, a 451 CAOS Theory analyst/blogger, pointed to how Microsoft’s moves in the open source arena will result in the usual Redmond-level scrutiny from developers and open source proponents. That there wil…
[...] Online Training and Tutorials wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt It seems we’ve arrived upon Microsoft open source. In the last couple of years, whenever there was discussion of Microsoft’s open source projects and efforts such as CodePlex … ) and Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL), and other licenses used in CodePlex, SourceForge [...]
[...] Microsoft open source may be good for open source – Jay Lyman at 451 CAOS says that Microsoft’s move might also help to further legitimize open source. I am not alone now. [...]
[...] candidates for open source on Windows. I believe the company, which has changed, is aware of the scrutiny on it and its strategy with open source. Does Microsoft want to know exactly which open source [...]
[...] the mixed-source mantra is getting pushed along quite well regardless of Redmond. Second, I have argued before Microsoft’s involvement in open source will rightfully draw the full and complete scrutiny of [...]
[...] and management vendor Black Duck Software. This follows on Microsoft’s work in 2007 to obtain OSI approval for its own open source [...]