<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft open source may be good for open source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/</link>
	<description>A blog for the enterprise open source community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; Licensing matters again in open source or not, virtualization and the cloud</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-531500</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; Licensing matters again in open source or not, virtualization and the cloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 23:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/#comment-531500</guid>
		<description>[...] may see Google get that OSI approval. It&#8217;s certainly not out of the ordinary, and even Microsoft has successfully lobbied and certified some of its own licenses as open source. However, for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may see Google get that OSI approval. It&#8217;s certainly not out of the ordinary, and even Microsoft has successfully lobbied and certified some of its own licenses as open source. However, for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; Microsoft realigning closer to open source</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-410891</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; Microsoft realigning closer to open source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 06:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/#comment-410891</guid>
		<description>[...] and management vendor Black Duck Software. This follows on Microsoft&#8217;s work in 2007 to obtain OSI approval for its own open source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and management vendor Black Duck Software. This follows on Microsoft&#8217;s work in 2007 to obtain OSI approval for its own open source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; Microsoft self interest is its commitment to open source</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-305008</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; Microsoft self interest is its commitment to open source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/#comment-305008</guid>
		<description>[...] the mixed-source mantra is getting pushed along quite well regardless of Redmond. Second, I have argued before Microsoft&#8217;s involvement in open source will rightfully draw the full and complete scrutiny of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the mixed-source mantra is getting pushed along quite well regardless of Redmond. Second, I have argued before Microsoft&#8217;s involvement in open source will rightfully draw the full and complete scrutiny of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; Microsoft IS targeting open source users</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-233885</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; Microsoft IS targeting open source users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/#comment-233885</guid>
		<description>[...] candidates for open source on Windows. I believe the company, which has changed, is aware of the scrutiny on it and its strategy with open source. Does Microsoft want to know exactly which open source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] candidates for open source on Windows. I believe the company, which has changed, is aware of the scrutiny on it and its strategy with open source. Does Microsoft want to know exactly which open source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Open Source, Open Solaris, Mozilla: links 28-10-2007 &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-218682</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Open Source, Open Solaris, Mozilla: links 28-10-2007 &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/#comment-218682</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft open source may be good for open source -  Jay Lyman at 451 CAOS says that Microsoft&#8217;s move might also help to further legitimize open source. I am not alone now. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft open source may be good for open source &#8211;  Jay Lyman at 451 CAOS says that Microsoft&#8217;s move might also help to further legitimize open source. I am not alone now. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux Code and More &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft open source may be good for open source</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-103025</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux Code and More &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft open source may be good for open source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/#comment-103025</guid>
		<description>[...] Online Training and Tutorials wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt It seems we’ve arrived upon Microsoft open source. In the last couple of years, whenever there was discussion of Microsoft’s open source projects and efforts such as CodePlex &#8230; ) and Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL), and other licenses used in CodePlex, SourceForge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Online Training and Tutorials wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt It seems we’ve arrived upon Microsoft open source. In the last couple of years, whenever there was discussion of Microsoft’s open source projects and efforts such as CodePlex &#8230; ) and Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL), and other licenses used in CodePlex, SourceForge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Unleashed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-97916</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Unleashed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/#comment-97916</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is a new dawn for the open source brand approaching?...&lt;/strong&gt;

In his post about Microsoft open source, Jay Lyman, a 451 CAOS Theory analyst/blogger, pointed to how Microsoft&#039;s moves in the open source arena will result in the usual Redmond-level scrutiny from developers and open source proponents. That there wil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is a new dawn for the open source brand approaching?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In his post about Microsoft open source, Jay Lyman, a 451 CAOS Theory analyst/blogger, pointed to how Microsoft&#8217;s moves in the open source arena will result in the usual Redmond-level scrutiny from developers and open source proponents. That there wil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista News</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-96940</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/10/26/microsoft-open-source-may-be-good-for-open-source/#comment-96940</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft open source may be good for open source...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting point at feeds.the451group.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microsoft open source may be good for open source&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting point at feeds.the451group.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

