451 CAOS Theory 
A blog for the enterprise open source community
MySQL in the firing line again as IBM snaps up SolidDB
Matthew Aslett, December 21, 2007 @ 7:44 am ETJust when I thought I’d be in for a quiet last day in the office before Christmas… IBM has announced that it is to acquire in-memory database specialist Solid Information Technology in a move that sees it competing directly up against the TimesTen functionality that Oracle acquired in June 2005.
The aqcuisition also has implications for MySQL given Solid’s development of the SolidDB for MySQL engine, an optional replacement for InnoDB (also of course acquired by Oracle).
While MySQL is in the firing line, it does not appear to be the intended target in this instance. MySQL was undoubtedly the target of Oracle’s Innobase acquisition, but at first glance it seems to be a side issue in IBM’s acquisition of Solid. This acquisition appears to be about IBM matching Oracle’s portfolio of 11g Database, TimesTen and Coherence with DB2, solidDB and WebSphere Extended Deployment (XD).
Subscribers to The 451 Group may have recently read how IBM and Solid have been working together to validate the market opportunity for a combination of solidDB’s in-memory database capabilities and IBM’s DB2 database. More information on that proof of concept project is available here (PDF).
As I noted: “Bundling solidDB and DB2 would give both companies a competitive alternative to Oracle’s combination of TimesTen and Oracle Database 11g, and provide Solid with a complement to MySQL Enterprise for solidDB.” The later is the production support package for the solidDB for MySQL engine.
Solid had planned to boost its support for MySQL in the new year following the release of MySQL 5.1. It will be interesting to see if IBM sticks to those plans, but given IBM’s support for multiple databases used against its hardware and software stack, it would not be at all surprising if it does. Let’s not forget that DB2 can also be used as a storage engine for MySQL on System i following the agreement struck between the two companies in April.
Categories: M&A, Software
Comments RSS feed | Trackback URI
[...] Matthew Rossi wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptJust when I thought I’d be in for a quiet last day in the office before Christmas… IBM has announced that it is to acquire in-memory database specialist Solid Information Technology in a move that sees it competing directly up against … [...]
I have no doubt that IBM will continue to work with MySQL on the initiatives that had been laid out. Remember that IBM and MySQL have a contract to port DB2 as a pluggable engine for mysql. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21430.wss
Indeed, I mentioned it at the end there.
[...] read more | digg story [...]
more bad news for mysql
[...] 451 Chaos Theory not only touts the value in source code, whether you want it or not but proves one of their points — that the value in open source is that it can go on even when the originators of the code change — when writing MySQL in the firing line again as IBM snaps up SolidDB. [...]
[...] mars 4, 2008 Some among us (myself included) once worried that IBM was joining with Oracle to besiege MySQL when it acquired solidDB, one of MySQL’s primary storage engines. It turns out, however, that IBM didn’t have such nefarious plans. In fact, it didn’t (or doesn’t) have plans for … [...]
[...] the decision to discontinue the development of the solidDB for MySQL database engine following its acquisition of in-memory database specialist Solid Information Technology. The official announcement is here on [...]