<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySQL in the firing line again as IBM snaps up SolidDB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/</link>
	<description>A blog for the enterprise open source community</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; IBM abandons solidDB for MySQL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-224984</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; IBM abandons solidDB for MySQL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-224984</guid>
		<description>[...] the decision to discontinue the development of the solidDB for MySQL database engine following its acquisition of in-memory database specialist Solid Information Technology. The official announcement is here on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the decision to discontinue the development of the solidDB for MySQL database engine following its acquisition of in-memory database specialist Solid Information Technology. The official announcement is here on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM discontinues development for a MySQL storage engine, solidDB : e-Spot.se</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-200975</link>
		<dc:creator>IBM discontinues development for a MySQL storage engine, solidDB : e-Spot.se</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-200975</guid>
		<description>[...] mars 4, 2008  Some among us (myself included) once worried that IBM was joining with Oracle to besiege MySQL when it acquired solidDB, one of MySQL's primary storage engines. It turns out, however, that IBM didn't have such nefarious plans. In fact, it didn't (or doesn't) have plans for ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mars 4, 2008  Some among us (myself included) once worried that IBM was joining with Oracle to besiege MySQL when it acquired solidDB, one of MySQL&#8217;s primary storage engines. It turns out, however, that IBM didn&#8217;t have such nefarious plans. In fact, it didn&#8217;t (or doesn&#8217;t) have plans for &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pythian Group Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Log Buffer #77: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-159002</link>
		<dc:creator>Pythian Group Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Log Buffer #77: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-159002</guid>
		<description>[...] 451 Chaos Theory not only touts the value in source code, whether you want it or not but proves one of their points &#8212; that the value in open source is that it can go on even when the originators of the code change &#8212; when writing MySQL in the firing line again as IBM snaps up SolidDB. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 451 Chaos Theory not only touts the value in source code, whether you want it or not but proves one of their points &#8212; that the value in open source is that it can go on even when the originators of the code change &#8212; when writing MySQL in the firing line again as IBM snaps up SolidDB. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mysql user</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-156930</link>
		<dc:creator>mysql user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-156930</guid>
		<description>more bad news for mysql :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more bad news for mysql <img src='http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoastalVoice &#187; MySQL in the firing line again as IBM snaps up SolidDB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-155660</link>
		<dc:creator>CoastalVoice &#187; MySQL in the firing line again as IBM snaps up SolidDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 08:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-155660</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Aslett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-154837</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Aslett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-154837</guid>
		<description>Indeed, I mentioned it at the end there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, I mentioned it at the end there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-154836</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-154836</guid>
		<description>I have no doubt that IBM will continue to work with MySQL on the initiatives that had been laid out.  Remember that IBM and MySQL have a contract to port DB2 as a pluggable engine for mysql. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21430.wss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no doubt that IBM will continue to work with MySQL on the initiatives that had been laid out.  Remember that IBM and MySQL have a contract to port DB2 as a pluggable engine for mysql. <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21430.wss" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www-03.ibm.com');">http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21430.wss</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian &#187; MySQL in the firing line again as IBM snaps up SolidDB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-154597</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian &#187; MySQL in the firing line again as IBM snaps up SolidDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/21/mysql-in-the-firing-line-again-as-ibm-snaps-up-soliddb/#comment-154597</guid>
		<description>[...] Matthew Rossi wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptJust when I thought I’d be in for a quiet last day in the office before Christmas… IBM has announced that it is to acquire in-memory database specialist Solid Information Technology in a move that sees it competing directly up against &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matthew Rossi wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptJust when I thought I’d be in for a quiet last day in the office before Christmas… IBM has announced that it is to acquire in-memory database specialist Solid Information Technology in a move that sees it competing directly up against &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
