<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun acquiring MySQL for $1bn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/</link>
	<description>A blog for the enterprise open source community</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; Why MySQL sold out</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-224173</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; Why MySQL sold out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-224173</guid>
		<description>[...] CEO, Marten Mickos, explaining his reasons for abandoning the company&#8217;s IPO in favor of being acquired by Sun. What made him and the open source database company&#8217;s top brass change their minds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CEO, Marten Mickos, explaining his reasons for abandoning the company&#8217;s IPO in favor of being acquired by Sun. What made him and the open source database company&#8217;s top brass change their minds [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; Give Me a M: The MySQL/Sun Q&#38;A</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-169243</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; Give Me a M: The MySQL/Sun Q&#38;A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-169243</guid>
		<description>[...] Q: What have the reactions to the news been so far? A: Generally positive, from my vantage point. As noted some have questioned the valuation, and others are reasonably skeptical, and both Glyn Moody and Matthew Aslett over at the 451 Group were decidedly mixed on the news. But reactions within the two firms have been almost uniformly positive, and outsiders like Andi Gutmans (Zend), Mark Radcliffe (DLA Piper), and Matt Mullenweg (WordPress) are all reasonably enthusiastic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Q: What have the reactions to the news been so far? A: Generally positive, from my vantage point. As noted some have questioned the valuation, and others are reasonably skeptical, and both Glyn Moody and Matthew Aslett over at the 451 Group were decidedly mixed on the news. But reactions within the two firms have been almost uniformly positive, and outsiders like Andi Gutmans (Zend), Mark Radcliffe (DLA Piper), and Matt Mullenweg (WordPress) are all reasonably enthusiastic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Aslett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-168944</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Aslett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-168944</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Simon. It sounded from the conference call as if Sun will do everything it can to position MySQL at the mission-critical apps tier, which PostgreSQL has previously claimed as its own. It will be interesting to see how supporting both works in practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Simon. It sounded from the conference call as if Sun will do everything it can to position MySQL at the mission-critical apps tier, which PostgreSQL has previously claimed as its own. It will be interesting to see how supporting both works in practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Phipps</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-168942</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-168942</guid>
		<description>The PostgreSQL support business is still firmly in place, and &lt;a href="http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/database/soup/archives/sun-acquires-mysql-21822" rel="nofollow"&gt;Josh Berkus is positive about Sun acquiring MySQL&lt;/a&gt; - he says &lt;blockquote&gt;Sun is not dropping PostgreSQL support. It's Sun's goal to be the #1 data center vendor, not the #1 MySQL vendor or #1 Oracle vendor. So Sun will continue to support PostgreSQL and other DBMSes alongside MySQL. In the world of databases, there is no "one size fits all".&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PostgreSQL support business is still firmly in place, and <a href="http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/database/soup/archives/sun-acquires-mysql-21822" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/blogs.ittoolbox.com');">Josh Berkus is positive about Sun acquiring MySQL</a> - he says<br />
<blockquote>Sun is not dropping PostgreSQL support. It&#8217;s Sun&#8217;s goal to be the #1 data center vendor, not the #1 MySQL vendor or #1 Oracle vendor. So Sun will continue to support PostgreSQL and other DBMSes alongside MySQL. In the world of databases, there is no &#8220;one size fits all&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SUN acquista MySQL! &#124; PettiNix</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-168894</link>
		<dc:creator>SUN acquista MySQL! &#124; PettiNix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-168894</guid>
		<description>[...] Le risposte da parte del team di MySQL sembrano positive, anche se qualcuno preoccupato c&#8217;è sempre, ora bisognerà aspettare qualche giorno per conoscere i piani di SUN ed il reale futuro di MySQL, non mancherò di aggiornarvi. Segnala presso:    Etichette: Annunci, Database, DBMS, FOSS, glassfish, MySQL, netbeans, open&#160;source, SUN [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Le risposte da parte del team di MySQL sembrano positive, anche se qualcuno preoccupato c&#8217;è sempre, ora bisognerà aspettare qualche giorno per conoscere i piani di SUN ed il reale futuro di MySQL, non mancherò di aggiornarvi. Segnala presso:    Etichette: Annunci, Database, DBMS, FOSS, glassfish, MySQL, netbeans, open&nbsp;source, SUN [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-168887</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/01/16/sun-acquiring-mysql-for-1bn/#comment-168887</guid>
		<description>Acquiring ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acquiring ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
