451 CAOS Theory 
A blog for the enterprise open source community
Open source database adoption: widespread but shallow
Matthew Aslett, March 26, 2008 @ 10:30 am ETToday sees the release of our latest CAOS report, Turning the Tables? – The impact of open source on the enterprise database market, which examines - as the subtitle suggests, how much of an impact the open source database projects and vendors have made on the traditional relational database market.
One of the key findings is that open source software has had a superficial impact on the enterprise database market in that adoption has been widespread but shallow. While open source databases have been widely deployed for Web-tier applications, there has been minimal adoption in the enterprise application tier, and adoption for enterprise applications is at this time limited to certain specific application workloads.
Some people may be inclined to disagree with that assessment, but you only have to look at the comparative revenues of the open source and proprietary vendors to see that there is a vast chasm to be crossed. While there are - of course - examples of enterprise adoption of open source databases, there are many more conservative database users out there, and it will take time for open source to make an impression on them.
Another finding is that for there to be increased adoption of open source databases at the enterprise application tier, a number of factors need to be addressed, including increased enterprise functionality, improved service and support offerings, proof that performance fears are misplaced, increased customer resistance to traditional database software licensing, and a move to Web-based architecture for internal applications.
The picture is not all bad, however. The 451 Group expects the adoption of open source database management systems to continue apace. The adoption of open source software for non-mission-critical applications and new projects will continue, and we expect to see open source databases gradually surround proprietary database deployments. At this stage, mainstream customers will begin to reevaluate their core database management offerings and examine whether open source is a viable option for mission-critical applications.
An executive summary of the report is available, and the full report may be purchased here. A press release is out, and we will also be hosting a Webinar next month to discuss the report and take some questions on it (Stay tuned to CAOS for further instructions on that). Please feel free to let us know what you think of our findings or your take on the impact of open source in the database market.
The report also formed the backdrop to yesterday’s panel discussion at the OSBC conference, and I just wanted to take this opportunity to thank the participants - both panel and audience members - who made sure it was an interested and informative discussion.
Email This Post
|
Technorati Links |
Bookmark on del.icio.us |
digg it
Categories: Software, The 451 Group
Comments RSS feed | Trackback URI
No arguments with your conclusions, but “you only have to look at the comparative revenues of the open source and proprietary vendors” — that’s apples to oranges. Many of the open-source systems have no revenues at all. There may not even be a good metric to compare PostgreSQL to Oracle, but revenue certainly isn’t it.
Point taken - there are other ways to measure impact, but we are talking specifically about the adoption of databases for enterprise applications, so there should be revenue involved.
Comments on The 451 Group’s Database Report & Red Hat’s 4Q revenue…
I want to thank Matt Aslett & The 451 Group for being brave enough to publish this report on the impact of open source databases on the DB market. An excerpt: “One of the key findings is that open source software has had a superficial impact on th…
[…] All of which explains why I’m surprised that anyone is surprised by the 451 Group’s report on the impact of open source on the database market. The word choice is controversial and surprisingly harsh (Matt calls it a glass half empty) from the perspective of open source database vendors, but I find little to argue with in its assessment of current market conditions: One of the key findings is that open source software has had a superficial impact on the enterprise database market in that adoption has been widespread but shallow. While open source databases have been widely deployed for Web-tier applications, there has been minimal adoption in the enterprise application tier, and adoption for enterprise applications is at this time limited to certain specific application workloads. […]
[…] The 451 Group just published a “glass half empty” assessment of the open-source database market. One massive takeaway? Open-source databases are widely used, but not yet deeply used. One of the key findings is that open source software has had a superficial impact on the enterprise database market in that […]
[…] 451 CAOS Theory » Open source database adoption: widespread but shallow - One of the key findings is that open source software has had a superficial impact on the enterprise database market in that adoption has been widespread but shallow. While open source databases have been widely deployed for Web-tier applications, there ha […]
[…] Certainly these were the findings of our survey of executives responsible for database purchasing, details of which were published in our recent CAOS report “Turning the Tables? – The impact of open source on the enterprise database market” (more details here). […]
[…] 451 CAOS Theory » Open source database adoption: widespread but shallow - One of the key findings is that open source software has had a superficial impact on the enterprise database market in that adoption has been widespread but shallow. While open source databases have been widely deployed for Web-tier applications, there ha […]
Don’t look back…
While I was on my way to the Open Source Goat Rodeo gathering in Utah, Bill Snyder, another blogger over at InfoWorld, posted a story called “Open Source Databases: The 97 Pound Weakling?” Despite the odd headline, Snyder’s post has a few interestin…
[…] the open-source database market is still relatively small (roughly $200 million in 2007, according to Gartner). But when The Wall Street Journal starts paying […]
[…] the open-source database market is still relatively small (roughly $200 million in 2007, according to Gartner). But when The Wall Street Journal starts paying […]
[…] the open-source database market is still relatively small (roughly $200 million in 2007, according to Gartner). But when The Wall Street Journal starts paying […]
[…] the open-source database market is still relatively small (roughly $200 million in 2007, according to Gartner). But when The Wall Street Journal starts paying […]
[…] 451 Group just released a report on open source DBMS adoption. In a blog post announcing same, Matthew Aslett wrote (emphasis mine): you only have to look at the […]