<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qlusters waves goodbye to openQRM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/</link>
	<description>A blog for the enterprise open source community</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; OpenQRM lives on</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/#comment-268762</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; OpenQRM lives on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=763#comment-268762</guid>
		<description>[...] previously reported on the demise of Qlusters, the former open source systems management firm that handed the development of the openQRM project over to the open source community in April and apparently [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previously reported on the demise of Qlusters, the former open source systems management firm that handed the development of the openQRM project over to the open source community in April and apparently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; Are VCs to blame for Qlusters&#8217; demise?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/#comment-246659</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; Are VCs to blame for Qlusters&#8217; demise?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=763#comment-246659</guid>
		<description>[...] July 15, 2008 @ 11:23 am ET  Three months after open source systems management vendor Qlusters handed its OpenQRM code over to Sourceforge the company has apparently closed its doors and fired its 30 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] July 15, 2008 @ 11:23 am ET  Three months after open source systems management vendor Qlusters handed its OpenQRM code over to Sourceforge the company has apparently closed its doors and fired its 30 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/#comment-220652</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=763#comment-220652</guid>
		<description>Bkackcrow, don't count on it. You can only speculate... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bkackcrow, don&#8217;t count on it. You can only speculate&#8230; <img src='http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackcrow</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/#comment-220533</link>
		<dc:creator>blackcrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=763#comment-220533</guid>
		<description>Looks like Qlusters lost its way and does not know where it is going. will probably join the dead pool soon. It started going down hill when the CTO William left to join BMC and when others like Don and Ofer left as well. another bad VC story ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Qlusters lost its way and does not know where it is going. will probably join the dead pool soon. It started going down hill when the CTO William left to join BMC and when others like Don and Ofer left as well. another bad VC story &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtualization Report &#124; David Marshall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/#comment-218129</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualization Report &#124; David Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=763#comment-218129</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;openQRM 3.5 released, but Qlusters bids it adieu...&lt;/strong&gt;

A posting on SourceForge.net states that Qlusters has released openQRM 3.5 to the open source community. The 3.5 release succeeds release 3.1.4 and includes a set of new features based on input from various datacenters and test/dev labs. And while a ne...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>openQRM 3.5 released, but Qlusters bids it adieu&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A posting on SourceForge.net states that Qlusters has released openQRM 3.5 to the open source community. The 3.5 release succeeds release 3.1.4 and includes a set of new features based on input from various datacenters and test/dev labs. And while a ne&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The evolving systems management ecosystem &#8212; Server Specs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/#comment-217972</link>
		<dc:creator>The evolving systems management ecosystem &#8212; Server Specs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=763#comment-217972</guid>
		<description>[...] In mid-April, Qlusters Inc., opted to drop its sponsorship of the openQRM project, an open source provisioning and monitoring tool. The Palo Alto, Calif.-based provider of data center management products and services handed over openQRM to the open source folks at SourceForge where the project will reportedly continue under the tutelage of project manager Matt Rechenburg. In a subsequent blog post, Matthew Anslett, an enterprise software analyst at the 451 Group speculates on the fate of Qlusters, wondering whether the OpenQRM announcement signals the demise of the “little four” group of open source systems management vendors. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In mid-April, Qlusters Inc., opted to drop its sponsorship of the openQRM project, an open source provisioning and monitoring tool. The Palo Alto, Calif.-based provider of data center management products and services handed over openQRM to the open source folks at SourceForge where the project will reportedly continue under the tutelage of project manager Matt Rechenburg. In a subsequent blog post, Matthew Anslett, an enterprise software analyst at the 451 Group speculates on the fate of Qlusters, wondering whether the OpenQRM announcement signals the demise of the “little four” group of open source systems management vendors. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/#comment-217823</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=763#comment-217823</guid>
		<description>[...] the announcement on April 9, the 451 group issued a report about the departure and speculated that Qlusters corporate could be in trouble. Qlusters, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the announcement on April 9, the 451 group issued a report about the departure and speculated that Qlusters corporate could be in trouble. Qlusters, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; Does your OS systems management got GPL?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/#comment-217724</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; Does your OS systems management got GPL?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=763#comment-217724</guid>
		<description>[...] three systems management ventures that have faltered recently &#8212; Levanta, Open Country and Qlusters &#8212; did not use GPL licensing. Levanta and Open Country did not even offer community or free [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] three systems management ventures that have faltered recently &#8212; Levanta, Open Country and Qlusters &#8212; did not use GPL licensing. Levanta and Open Country did not even offer community or free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Profoss news</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/04/10/qlusters-waves-goodbye-to-openqrm/#comment-217444</link>
		<dc:creator>Profoss news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=763#comment-217444</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;OpenQRM independent from Qlusters...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OpenQRM independent from Qlusters&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
