451 CAOS Theory *
A blog for the enterprise open source community

LinuxWorld 2008 - nobody cares

Jay Lyman, August 6, 2008 @ 1:10 am ET

There are certain phrases that we tend to hear a lot from vendors — ‘enterprise-class, best of breed, customer choice,’ etc. However, I was repeatedly hearing somewhat surprising phrases as I made the rounds at LinuxWorld this year: ‘We don’t care, customers don’t care, no one cares …”

Don’t get me wrong. Linux and open source have not reached the point where the software is so good, vendors and customers don’t have to care about it. The point seems to be this: there is less concern or ‘care’ about whether the operating system is Linux, Windows, Solaris or other; fewer customers care whether the software in use is open source or not; and there seems to be a general recognition that the fact a product or vendor is open source does not matter as much.

Sure, open source is still a significant differentiator. It allows vendors to get software and products into customer hands more quickly and broadly. It typically provides significant cost savings to customers. However, it is far less exotic and foreign in the enterprise, both for vendors and customers, who seem to be viewing open source not as religion, philosophy or idealism, but as just another option.

Vendors supporting various operating systems indicated there is less care about the underlying OS. Part of this can be attributed to virtualization, which allows servers and VMs running different operating systems to be managed in a unified manner. Still, even the difference between virtual and physical servers seems to be of less care to vendors, which are now moving to support and include both in their products and plans. Other vendors discussed how the use of virtual appliances and cloud computing were minimizing how much care centers on the OS, since it is becoming less visible to partners and users.

As for those users and customers, who are playing an increasingly significant role in Linux and open source, there also appears to be less care about whether software is open source. Instead, customers have come to expect comparable or superior features and functionality at less cost. Open source is often the way vendors and their products get there, but customers don’t really care.

So does all this lack of care mean that open source is in danger of losing its edge? I don’t think so. Rather, it is further testament to the continued enterprise maturation and acceptance of Linux and other open source software.

viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen
Permalink | Technorati Links | Bookmark on del.icio.us | digg it
Categories: Business models, Funding, Software

Comments RSS feed | Trackback URI

12 Comments»

Collapse Comment by Mike, August 6, 2008 10:50 am

You must be a Windows User and not someone who works or uses UNIX / Linux. You have no idea how useful Linux / UNIX is used in the corporate network. UNIX / Linux is the most secure OS available, it doesn’t matter if it’s free or not. Linux is because of the GNU/GPL license, yet UNIX still costs money. The average customer doesn’t care about Linux or UNIX because it does nothing for them. Most Windows users would say they can do the same thing using a GUI instead of typing in commands at a prompt. In IT UNIX / Linux is are greatest resource. If you take a look at a good UNIX server you’ll find that most have only been shutdown to do a major release candidate update (RC). I know IT System Admins (UNIX) that have not rebooted their UNIX server in almost 15 years. Why? Because there is no need to. Unlike Windows that breaks. Even most web servers now a days use Linux Distributions not because it’s free but it’s more reliable, and has better security. Something that OpenSource has that Microsoft will probably never have.

UNIX and Linux are made for people who know what they are doing. Programmers, and IT System Admins are probably the highest amount of people out there that use UNIX or Linux enviroment.

Collapse Comment by Jay Lyman, August 6, 2008 10:54 am

You’re right. I am a Windows user. However, I am primarily a Linux user, and find my Windows computers getting less and less use every day. I agree on the usefulness of Linux and the stability issues with Windows. As to your contention I have no idea how useful Linux/Unix is in the corporate network, I don’t care.

JL

Collapse Comment by apetrelli, August 6, 2008 11:24 am

You certainly didn’t come across as primarily a Linux user, unless you mean some off the shelf distribution targeting consumers.

Your original posting missed all the key drivers in the enterprise sector, and your contention that such customer’s “don’t care” produced quite a chuckle among my colleagues and I, as we sit in a lounge at SFO.

Collapse Comment by Jay Lyman, August 6, 2008 12:00 pm

Sorry I didn’t express myself the way you think a Linux user should (not). I use Ubuntu, Debian and Xandros. Glad you got a chuckle, that was kind of the point.

JL

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Collapse Comment by Dominic, August 7, 2008 4:39 pm

Mike’s comment almost proves Jay’s point. IT admins like Linux because it’s cheaper and more secure, not just because it happens to be open source. Being open source probably helped make it a more secure and cost-effective OS, but open source is a means to an end, not an end itself.

I agree with Jay - Customers value functionality and how well business needs are addressed, not whether it’s open source. The sooner the commercial open source industry starts marketing open source as a means to superior ends, instead of an end unto itself, the better off it will be.

 
 
Collapse Pingback by tecosystems » links for 2008-08-06 [delicious.com], August 6, 2008 9:33 pm

[...] 451 CAOS Theory ยป LinuxWorld 2008 - nobody cares "Vendors supporting various operating systems indicated there is less care about the underlying OS." - i pretty much never hear this. if anything, the opposite: ISVs grumble about the difficulty of supporting multiple OSs, and that Linux != one OS (tags: linux 451group linuxworld support operatingsystems jaylyman) [...]

 

[...] enterprise evolution and maturity. It’s also interesting to see how as open source has become less of a factor and more of a choice and which advantages are perceived or becoming most important to customers. While cost is always a [...]

 
Collapse Pingback by Has open source won–or has it lost? | HollySwanson.com, October 17, 2008 9:43 am

[...] swaths of open source have become mainstream–to the point of invisibility. Jay Lyman summed this up well … Written by admin in: I.T Blogs & Feeds, cNet.com [...]

 

[...] software players are becoming ‘mixed-source’ companies. Sure, vendors and users seem to care less about whether the software they use, support, sell and pay for is open source or not, but those [...]

 

[...] Linux, which by most standards is, well, standard in the enterprise. My blog about the subject, ‘LinuxWorld 2008-nobody cares’ was not about how Linux has become less significant, but rather how Linux and open source have [...]

 

[...] the community managers gone? Jay Lyman, January 13, 2009 @ 9:55 pm ET Over this summer, at OSCON, LinuxWorld, other events and in briefings and other conversations, I saw and heard a lot about the importance [...]

 

[...] commercial adoption of open source. However, as we’ve seen in other cases when open source matters more on an underlying level, open source software is somewhat of an aside in the SpringSource-Hyperic [...]

 

Leave a Comment

Some HTML is allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)