451 CAOS Theory *
A blog for the enterprise open source community

Why I won’t be using Google’s Chrome much

Jay Lyman, September 2, 2008 @ 2:44 pm ET

I’ve been excitedly anticipating the release of the new Chrome browser from Google, but now that it’s out in beta for Windows, I don’t think I’ll be using it very much.

It’s too bad, because I was just thinking what a good thing Apple’s Safari and Mozilla Firefox have been, pushing innovative features and forcing the more dominant player, Microsoft, to more aggressively advance its own Internet Explorer browser.

So Chrome only shines for Windows, at least for now. Odd, I think, coming from a company that is heavily reliant on Linux and full or at least well-stocked with its own Linux users and developers. It also adds to Google’s somewhat peculiar series of statements and moves on open source licenses.

It’s even more frustrating to see Google release Chrome — which itself is open source and, like Safari, based on the Webkit open source framework — but not support Linux. For all of its talk about choice of browser, Google’s rollout of Chrome only highlights the lack of choice on OS.

However, it is not these issues or reservations that will keep me from using Chrome. I’ll shut down my primary computer and boot it up in Windows to give Chrome a try after things have calmed a bit, but I really don’t enjoy using my Windows very much (not as much as Linux), and use is limited mainly to Webinars and rare instances when a vendor or project provides support only for Windows. Luckily for me, those instances are occurring less and less. And when Google gets around to putting Chrome on Linux, I’ll be ready to really take it for a drive.

viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen
Permalink | Technorati Links | Bookmark on del.icio.us | digg it
Categories: Software

Comments RSS feed | Trackback URI

12 Comments»

Collapse Comment by Sid, September 2, 2008 10:48 pm
 

[...] Lyman has already covered the most disappointing feature: the lack of support for Linux or Mac [...]

 
Collapse Comment by Jonathan Barel, September 4, 2008 8:06 am

The lack of Linux support is downright ridiculous.
They have code you can download and build, they state that There is no working Chromium-based browser on Linux. Although many Chromium submodules build under Linux and a few unit tests pass, all that runs is a command-line “all tests pass” executable.

Hard to imagine they don’t even have an internal version that runs on Linux!

 
Collapse Comment by Jean Azzopardi, September 5, 2008 1:20 pm

Sorry, but why are you surprised? It’s a known fact that with Google, windows releases take priority. Google Earth, Picasa, Google Search, Google Desktop etc, all of these were released on Windows before they were released on Linux. And quite frankly, what do you expect? That they give priority to Linux instead of Windows, to a niche OS? Or else, would you have them delay the release so that they release them on the same day? I use Linux, too, but I don’t mind the wait..and I’m not griping about it. They are working on it, so wait like everybody else!

Collapse Comment by Jay Lyman, September 5, 2008 3:31 pm

OK OK. I’ll wait. I wouldn’t gripe so much if I didn’t think Google was passing on an opportunity to show it does give back to Linux, it does participate in open source and it does respect choice. By not including Linux or even Mac support from the get-go, it highlights the lack of choice of OS that it is perpetuating.

Maybe it’s more focused on Windows machines since you don’t find IE living on Linux PCs or Macs? Meanwhile, we’re waiting.

JL

Collapse Comment by Jean Azzopardi, September 5, 2008 4:52 pm

I don’t deny it. Google’s main competitor is Internet Explorer, and that is the major browser that is closed source. By engaging it directly, the OSS “love” is being spread more efficiently.

 
 
Collapse Comment by djohnston, September 5, 2008 3:33 pm

“That they give priority to Linux instead of Windows, to a niche OS?” Exactly. Google’s infrastructure is built on Linux. Why SHOULDN’T they put their apps on Linux first? Wouldn’t that “inspire” the killer apps to switch users to Linux?

Collapse Comment by Jean Azzopardi, September 5, 2008 4:51 pm

Because there’s a difference between infrastructure and what normal people use on the desktop. And at the end of the day, Google doesn’t give a damn about inspiring users to switch to Linux. What it wants is to get its apps out as fast as possible, to as many users as possible. Also, it will probably leverage the help of the OSS community to get a Linux browser out.

And no, nobody is going to switch to Linux just to run a browser, no matter who released it. It may be a good application, but it’s not as if it’s the only one in its field.

 
 
 
Collapse Comment by capricornus, September 6, 2008 10:13 am

I admired it, but don’t love it. I won’t use it, although I don´t hate it. I prefer FF because of the extensions, because of the freedom I believe FF offers by allowing “CustomizeGoogle”, “AdBlock” and “NoScript”. That means: no ads, no ads and no DoubleClick (Google behind).
As for the engine and Java wars, I think thát´s a good thing, like the race between Dash and Ariel, or VW and SEAT: let the better win.

 
Collapse Comment by sillyxone, September 7, 2008 5:01 pm

Eventually there will be a working Linux version, but given that Google is using the Debian license instead of GPL, I just feel like they are leeching the community. I mean, how different their proprietary codes and the open-source codes will be. While there are ways to submit patches to the open-source version, it’s a one way contribution. How many patches and cool features in the proprietary version that won’t go back into the open-source version?

I got enlightened by RMS and his GPL more and more everyday.

 
Collapse Comment by film fan, September 16, 2008 5:37 pm

there are so many advantages and features with Chrome, such as it’s speed, for example; now if only they would take care it’s flighty cookie management…

 
Collapse Pingback by 451 CAOS Theory » Will mobile open source learn from closed?, September 24, 2008 2:54 pm

[...] own applications to mobile devices. I’ve also covered some of the issues with Google’s Chrome browser and overall open source strategy. However, compared to Apple, which has increasingly been [...]

 

Leave a Comment

Some HTML is allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)