451 CAOS Theory *
A blog for the enterprise open source community

Will mobile open source learn from closed?

, September 24, 2008 @ 12:55 pm ET

I’ve been talking to mobile OS, mobile middleware and mobile application vendors over the last few weeks as part of my research for another CAOS special report on open source in the mobile market. At the same time, the news has been full of headlines about the first Google Android phone, the outlook for an open-sourced Symbian and of course, Apple’s iPhone.

The timing seems interesting to me, as Google attempts to leverage a mobile Linux OS and open source to garner its usual developer strength, and Apple works to control its mobile OS and the applications that may or may not run on it.

No question Android is aimed primarily at extending Google’s own applications to mobile devices. I’ve also covered some of the issues with Google’s Chrome browser and overall open source strategy. However, compared to Apple, which has increasingly been the focus of skepticism from FOSS supporters, Google seems to be much more open, both in the sense of code and to the idea of third-party development. Google and Android are also getting some help from members of the Open Handset Alliance (HTC, Samsung, Motorola, Intel, Qualcomm, Texas Instruments and others). Despite a previous lack of mobile operator on board, T-Mobile has of course stepped up to sell services for the first Android phone, HTC’s G1. Google’s partnership with Amazon for Android support in its music store and a more open Android Market are also significant for Apple and the market.

If Google and OHA are not learning from Apple’s moves, both good and bad, there are others who may be able to take advantage of a more open approach. In fact, the two with perhaps the most to learn, Nokia’s open sourced Symbian and the larger LiMO consortium, are most likely to compete with one another given their strength and presence in markets outside of North America — mainly Asia and Europe. Interesting developments here include the recent inclusion of Open Kernel Labs and its embedded hypervisor technology in the Symbian Partner Network. As for LiMO, the mobile Linux consortium that includes membership from a number of hardware, software and mobile operator players, just announced a Panasonic phone that is the 23rd LiMO-compliant handset in the market.

Permalink | Technorati Links | Bookmark on del.icio.us | digg it
Comments (4) Categories: Software

4 Responses to “Will mobile open source learn from closed?”

  1. Stormy says:

    One of the things that helps Google be completely open is that they act 100% sure in their business model of making money from ads and not everything else. I believe one of the reasons that others like Apple can’t be more open is that they’re afraid of losing potential revenue stream. They don’t really get how those other apps (that compete with iTunes!) might make them more money in the longer term.

    P.S. Please, please make the font size in your comment box larger! I can barely see what I’m typing!

    • Jay Lyman says:

      Thanks for posting Stormy,

      dang that is small isn’t it? we’ll try to fix it soon. As for your point about ad revenue, that’s definitely an important element that I failed to mention. I think it highlights how the advantages to end-to-end control of the hw and sw are changing and we’re seeing a desire by many in the mobile space for more openness and flexibility.

      JL

  2. [...] hardware manufacturers and others eager to spur and speed device and application development. We asked recently whether mobile open source software players would learn from the more closed approach of [...]

  3. [...] wrote last year about how openness was emerging as a significant factor, differentiator and disruptor in [...]