<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And the best open source license is &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/</link>
	<description>A blog for the enterprise open source community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verizon Wireless to Open Network &#124; Echelon-Us</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/comment-page-1/#comment-492623</link>
		<dc:creator>Verizon Wireless to Open Network &#124; Echelon-Us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=1217#comment-492623</guid>
		<description>[...] 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is … [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is … [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Lyman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/comment-page-1/#comment-463601</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Lyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=1217#comment-463601</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting Mark. I agree that asking which open source license is best does not have much meaning or relevance unless the second half of the phrase determines best for what? Best from most lawyers perspective? Best from most developers perspective? Best for distribution and development? Best for creation of extensions and plug-ins? Best for dual-licensing monetization? Best for support and services monetization? And the list goes on ...

This debate was meant, I believe, largely as an introduction to some of the basic ideas, themes, differences and nuances of different open source software licenses. 

I think that your license choices for the objectives you mention make sense, but it is also important to remember that all of these licenses and options serve to help one another, so that if a particular license does not fit your needs, objectives and situation, you can usually find one that does within the list of OSI-approved ones, and more frequently, within the top dozen most popular OS licenses. My point is that every situation is different, and we see a variety of business models using a variety of open source licenses -- something that will likely continue. As Mike Milinkovich says, we have not even yet seen all of the possible combinations of licenses and business models.

Thanks again for the post. I encourage readers to check out your talk and blog.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting Mark. I agree that asking which open source license is best does not have much meaning or relevance unless the second half of the phrase determines best for what? Best from most lawyers perspective? Best from most developers perspective? Best for distribution and development? Best for creation of extensions and plug-ins? Best for dual-licensing monetization? Best for support and services monetization? And the list goes on &#8230;</p>
<p>This debate was meant, I believe, largely as an introduction to some of the basic ideas, themes, differences and nuances of different open source software licenses. </p>
<p>I think that your license choices for the objectives you mention make sense, but it is also important to remember that all of these licenses and options serve to help one another, so that if a particular license does not fit your needs, objectives and situation, you can usually find one that does within the list of OSI-approved ones, and more frequently, within the top dozen most popular OS licenses. My point is that every situation is different, and we see a variety of business models using a variety of open source licenses &#8212; something that will likely continue. As Mike Milinkovich says, we have not even yet seen all of the possible combinations of licenses and business models.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the post. I encourage readers to check out your talk and blog.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Radcliffe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/comment-page-1/#comment-463597</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Radcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=1217#comment-463597</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that this question has any meaning without disucssing what you are trying to achieve. The APL or BSD would be most appropriate for a company that wants to ensure that its software is widely used and is less concerned about obtaining revenue from a dual licensing model. GPL (and EPL) work best for a dual licensing model with the potential drawback that many corporations are skeptical about GPLv3. These choices are summarized in my OSBC presentation at http://www.slideshare.net/markradcliffe/ip-and-licensing-strategy-for-open-source-companies and my blog www.lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that this question has any meaning without disucssing what you are trying to achieve. The APL or BSD would be most appropriate for a company that wants to ensure that its software is widely used and is less concerned about obtaining revenue from a dual licensing model. GPL (and EPL) work best for a dual licensing model with the potential drawback that many corporations are skeptical about GPLv3. These choices are summarized in my OSBC presentation at <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/markradcliffe/ip-and-licensing-strategy-for-open-source-companies" rel="nofollow">http://www.slideshare.net/markradcliffe/ip-and-licensing-strategy-for-open-source-companies</a> and my blog <a href="http://www.lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Lyman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/comment-page-1/#comment-462869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Lyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=1217#comment-462869</guid>
		<description>The link may not have been up yet, but you can actually watch the debate and hear the points for yourself here - http://fosslc.org/drupal/node/523

Thanks for your interest.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link may not have been up yet, but you can actually watch the debate and hear the points for yourself here &#8211; <a href="http://fosslc.org/drupal/node/523" rel="nofollow">http://fosslc.org/drupal/node/523</a></p>
<p>Thanks for your interest.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shingai</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/comment-page-1/#comment-462855</link>
		<dc:creator>Shingai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=1217#comment-462855</guid>
		<description>I searched the FOSS website, but was unable to find an actual transcript of the debate.  Is there one available?  Or perhaps any summaries?  I&#039;m interested in reading through some of the exact points since I am in the licensing phase of some tools that I myself am developing and am not exactly versed enough in legalese to read through the licensing documents themselves with full comprehension (at least in a timeframe that I can afford)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I searched the FOSS website, but was unable to find an actual transcript of the debate.  Is there one available?  Or perhaps any summaries?  I&#8217;m interested in reading through some of the exact points since I am in the licensing phase of some tools that I myself am developing and am not exactly versed enough in legalese to read through the licensing documents themselves with full comprehension (at least in a timeframe that I can afford)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is … [the451group.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/comment-page-1/#comment-461789</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is … [the451group.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=1217#comment-461789</guid>
		<description>[...] 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is …  blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  An open source blog by The 451 Group. &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is …  blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  An open source blog by The 451 Group. &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is … &#171; Computer Internet and Technology Articles.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/comment-page-1/#comment-461574</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is … &#171; Computer Internet and Technology Articles.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=1217#comment-461574</guid>
		<description>[...] more here: 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is …  August 31st, 2009 &#124; Tags: enterprise, license, linux, networks, open-source, security, systems, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here: 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is …  August 31st, 2009 | Tags: enterprise, license, linux, networks, open-source, security, systems, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is …&#160;&#124;&#160;Open Hacking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/comment-page-1/#comment-461572</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is …&#160;&#124;&#160;Open Hacking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=1217#comment-461572</guid>
		<description>[...] post: 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is …    This entry was posted on Monday, August 31st, 2009 at 1:03 pm and is filed under Linux, News, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is …    This entry was posted on Monday, August 31st, 2009 at 1:03 pm and is filed under Linux, News, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Math World &#124; 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is …</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2009/08/31/and-the-best-open-source-license-is/comment-page-1/#comment-461560</link>
		<dc:creator>Math World &#124; 451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is …</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/?p=1217#comment-461560</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is the original:  451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is … [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is the original:  451 CAOS Theory » And the best open source license is … [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

