451 CAOS Theory 
A blog for the enterprise open source community
Open source is not a business model
Matthew Aslett, October 13, 2008 @ 6:14 am ET(Or “freedom of speech won’t feed my children”)
Last month I noted that Matt Asay, one of the highest profile proponents of open source software, had changed his position on the use of proprietary extensions as a means of attracting paying customers to software based on open source code.
Having previously advocated a 100% open source approach, [...]
Comments (20) Categories: Business models, Licensing, Software, The 451 Group
Managing expectations with Open-Core Licensing
Matthew Aslett, September 10, 2008 @ 9:27 am ETMatt Asay has continued his public conversion to the merits of proprietary extensions/value-add services with the publication of a new post in which he argues that the Open-Core Licensing model is not just good for business but also good for community-relations.
“It’s actually quite difficult to distribute a 100 percent open-source product and monetize [...]
Comments (1) Categories: Business models, Licensing, Software
Andrew Lampitt defines Open-Core Licensing
Matthew Aslett, September 1, 2008 @ 9:50 am ETJasperSoft’s business development director Andrew Lampitt has kicked off his new blog with an interesting post related to business models used by open source-related vendors.
In it he attempts to define the approach utilized by the likes of JasperSoft and SugarCRM, which offer open source products with core functionality, as well as commercial extensions. The [...]
Comments (6) Categories: Business models, Software
Hell freezes over - Matt Asay on the problem of open source revenue models
Matthew Aslett, August 28, 2008 @ 4:34 am ETThe effects of global warming must be worse than were first thought. Matt Asay has admitted that it makes sense for software vendors to charge upfront license fees.
While I am being facetious, the recent post from Matt - titled “the problem with open-source revenue models” - is an interesting insight into the fact that open [...]
Comments (7) Categories: Business models, Licensing
Open source is dead, long live open source
Matthew Aslett, August 27, 2008 @ 5:05 am ETA couple of articles have been published recently that point to a growing realisation/admission about the role that open source will play in the future of enterprise software.
In “The Commercial Bear Hug of Open Source” Dan Woods details the various methods by which open source has become increasingly commercial in recent years, while in “The [...]
Comments (10) Categories: Business models, Software
Commercial licensing is a double-edged sword
Matthew Aslett, August 19, 2008 @ 10:40 am ETLarry Dignan reports on a coming revolution in software support and maintenance contracts, prompted by Dennis Howlett’s excellent analysis of why the reliance of enterprise software vendors on maintenance revenue is unsustainable.
Noting the negative response to recent price rises from Oracle and SAP, Dennis maintains that increasing maintenance costs is unsustainable as it reduces [...]
Comments (5) Categories: Business models, Licensing, Software
Asking the right questions of open source
Matthew Aslett, August 18, 2008 @ 6:14 am ETA classic Morecambe and Wise comedy sketch from the 1970s sees Andre Previn criticizing Eric for playing all the wrong notes while attempting the Greig Piano Concerto. Morecambe responds that he is in fact “playing all the right notes. But not necessarily in the right order.”
I was reminded of the sketch this morning while reading [...]
Comments (7) Categories: Business models, Funding, M&A, Software
Sometimes a developer community isn’t the answer
Matthew Aslett, August 12, 2008 @ 6:26 am ETI was in San Francisco at the tail-end of last week and was fortunate to have some time to meet up with Josh Berkus, a member of the PostgreSQL core team and, until recently, a Sun employee.
Our conversation covered a lot of ground, including his reasons for leaving Sun (he didn’t go into detail but [...]
Comments (9) Categories: Business models, Software
LinuxWorld 2008 - nobody cares
Jay Lyman, August 6, 2008 @ 1:10 am ETThere are certain phrases that we tend to hear a lot from vendors — ‘enterprise-class, best of breed, customer choice,’ etc. However, I was repeatedly hearing somewhat surprising phrases as I made the rounds at LinuxWorld this year: ‘We don’t care, customers don’t care, no one cares …”
Don’t get me wrong. Linux and open source [...]
Comments (7) Categories: Business models, Funding, Software
Judging open source business models
Matthew Aslett, August 1, 2008 @ 5:38 am ETAt the OSI blog Andrew C Oliver discusses the potential for the OSI to “develop standards beyond the current license-centric set of standards known as the ‘Open Source Definition‘” with which to judge the business models of open source vendors.
He was responding to this post from Michael DeHaan that defines a list of the principles [...]
Comments (4) Categories: Business models, Licensing, Software
The apiarist’s dilemma
Matthew Aslett, July 28, 2008 @ 11:45 am ETTwo interesting posts on the subject of vendor and community open source development have been published today by Stephen O’Grady and Matt Asay. First Stephen called for the rhetoric to be toned down and for participants in the ongoing debate to avoid claiming that one governance model is “better” than the other.
“Organic projects might generate [...]
Comments (1) Categories: Business models, Software
Could Google be stymied by a lack of openness?
Matthew Aslett, July 17, 2008 @ 12:10 pm ETIt seems almost churlish to wonder whether Google could be even more successful than it already is with a different strategy, but the company’s approach to open source and open development has come into focus in recent weeks.
On last week’s podcast we discussed whether the company should see the AGPL as more of an opportunity [...]
Comments (3) Categories: Business models, Licensing, Mobile, Software
The vocabulary of open source development models
Matthew Aslett, June 26, 2008 @ 6:12 am ETJames Dixon has given the thumbs-up to my stretching his Bee Keeper analogy to explain open source development models (which is nice) and in doing so has suggested a new term to help quickly explain the difference between vendor- and community- dominated development projects.
The debate about the difference between the two approaches, and the language [...]
Comments (7) Categories: Business models, Software
Applying the Bee Keeper model beyond captive open source projects
Matthew Aslett, June 20, 2008 @ 8:50 am ETI’ve been reading The Bee Keeper (also here in PDF), an explanation of the relationship between professional open source software (POSS) vendors and their communities, written by Pentaho’s CTO James Dixon. It is a very elegant explanation of the development/business model employed by the POSS vendors such as MySQL, Pentaho, JBoss and Alfresco.
James uses [...]
Comments (6) Categories: Business models, Software
Funambol - AGPL’d, ad-supported mobile open source
Jay Lyman, June 12, 2008 @ 3:23 pm ETMobile open source player Funambol is certainly giving us plenty to watch these days with its Affero GPL licensing, its use of ad-supported mobile phone access to email and general bet on mobile open source software. Like an audience watching the tightrope act, we’re observing intently (Funambol translates from the Latin words funis (rope) and [...]
more...Comments (2) Categories: Business models, Software
The elephant in the room
Matthew Aslett, June 10, 2008 @ 9:19 am ETContinuing the ongoing discussion about open source software business models, Rich Sharples of Red Hat’s JBoss division weighs in on an issue I have with Savio Rodrigues’s categorization of open source users: namely the fact that it does not take into account the value of the application in question.
As Rich points out, Savio’s categorization assumes [...]
Add Comment Categories: Business models, Software
Smashing the open source glass ceiling
Matthew Aslett, June 9, 2008 @ 9:53 am ETLast week I asked whether open source vendors face a glass ceiling, prompted by Savio Rodrigues’s suggestion that a pure open source support model will only get vendors so far.
While I remain unconvinced at this stage* Savio is in no doubt that such a ceiling exists and has continued his argument with a suggestion as [...]
Comments (6) Categories: Business models, Software
Does open source have a glass ceiling?
Matthew Aslett, June 6, 2008 @ 6:58 am ETSavio Rodrigues has published an interesting post about the adoption of commercial open source software that brings together his thoughts about open source business models and suggests that commercial open source vendors may be heading for a glass ceiling.
As Savio puts it: “OSS lowers marketing, distribution, and sales costs. And yes, OSS is a great [...]
Comments (6) Categories: Business models, Software
EnterpriseDB under new management
Matthew Aslett, June 4, 2008 @ 5:14 pm ETEnterpriseDB’s new CEO, Ed Boyajian, is planning on using his experience of growing enterprise adoption of open source software projects at Red Hat to take EnterpriseDB to the next level. The company announced today that Boyajian is taking over from Andy Astor, who becomes executive vice president of business development.
Boyajian was previously vice president [...]
Comments (1) Categories: Business models, Software
Google - an open source adopter’s best friend?
Matthew Aslett, June 3, 2008 @ 5:24 am ET“How do enterprises learn about open source alternatives?” was the first question posed on CIO.com’s Executives Online blogathon. A surprising number of respondents listed Google as the first port of call.
For example, Chris Keene wrote: “Here is a simple test. If you are looking for a technical solution - for example a visual ajax tool [...]
more...Add Comment Categories: Business models, Licensing
Next Page »



